From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> There is a pair of adjacent "if" statements with identical conditions in the lock_torture_writer() function. This commit therefore combines them.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> --- kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c index 57ee16cf879d..c8c322e69a90 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c @@ -889,11 +889,10 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg) lock_is_write_held = true; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&lock_is_read_held))) lwsp->n_lock_fail++; /* rare, but... */ - lwsp->n_lock_acquired++; - } - if (!skip_main_lock) { + cxt.cur_ops->write_delay(&rand); + lock_is_write_held = false; WRITE_ONCE(last_lock_release, jiffies); cxt.cur_ops->writeunlock(tid); -- 2.34.1
