On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 07:24:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > So, at least until GCC catches up to clang's code generation, I take it > that you don't want WRITE_ONCE() for that ->nvcsw increment. Thoughts on > ->on_rq?
I've not done the patch yet, but I suspect those would be fine, those are straight up stores, hard to get wrong (famous last words).
