On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 02:59:58PM +0200, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> +void init_cfs_throttle_work(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + /* Protect against double add, see throttle_cfs_rq() and
> throttle_cfs_rq_work() */
> + p->sched_throttle_work.next = &p->sched_throttle_work;
> + init_task_work(&p->sched_throttle_work, throttle_cfs_rq_work);
Yes, init_task_work() does not write .next, but can we please flip these
two statements and avoid me having to double check that every time I
seem them? :-)
> +}
