From: Valentin Schneider <vschn...@redhat.com>
The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to
RCU_WATCHING, the dynticks prefix can go.
While at it, this helper is only meant to be called after failing an
earlier call to rcu_watching_snap_in_eqs(), document this in the comments
and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for good measure.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschn...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadh...@kernel.org>
---
.../Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 23 ++++++++++++++-----
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
index 2d7036ad7476..7163d0def34e 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ This case is handled by calls to the strongly ordered
is invoked within ``rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter()`` at idle-entry
time and within ``rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit()`` at idle-exit time.
The grace-period kthread invokes first ``ct_rcu_watching_cpu_acquire()``
-(preceded by a full memory barrier) and ``rcu_dynticks_in_eqs_since()``
+(preceded by a full memory barrier) and ``rcu_watching_snap_stopped_since()``
(both of which rely on acquire semantics) to detect idle CPUs.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 73516d76b70a..93570cb5e99e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -308,12 +308,20 @@ static bool rcu_watching_snap_in_eqs(int snap)
return !(snap & CT_RCU_WATCHING);
}
-/*
- * Return true if the CPU corresponding to the specified rcu_data
- * structure has spent some time in an extended quiescent state since
- * rcu_dynticks_snap() returned the specified snapshot.
+/**
+ * rcu_watching_snap_stopped_since() - Has RCU stopped watching a given CPU
+ * since the specified @snap?
+ *
+ * @rdp: The rcu_data corresponding to the CPU for which to check EQS.
+ * @snap: rcu_watching snapshot taken when the CPU wasn't in an EQS.
+ *
+ * Returns true if the CPU corresponding to @rdp has spent some time in an
+ * extended quiescent state since @snap. Note that this doesn't check if it
+ * /still/ is in an EQS, just that it went through one since @snap.
+ *
+ * This is meant to be used in a loop waiting for a CPU to go through an EQS.
*/
-static bool rcu_dynticks_in_eqs_since(struct rcu_data *rdp, int snap)
+static bool rcu_watching_snap_stopped_since(struct rcu_data *rdp, int snap)
{
/*
* The first failing snapshot is already ordered against the accesses
@@ -323,6 +331,9 @@ static bool rcu_dynticks_in_eqs_since(struct rcu_data *rdp,
int snap)
* performed by the remote CPU prior to entering idle and therefore can
* rely solely on acquire semantics.
*/
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_watching_snap_in_eqs(snap)))
+ return true;
+
return snap != ct_rcu_watching_cpu_acquire(rdp->cpu);
}
@@ -815,7 +826,7 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
* read-side critical section that started before the beginning
* of the current RCU grace period.
*/
- if (rcu_dynticks_in_eqs_since(rdp, rdp->dynticks_snap)) {
+ if (rcu_watching_snap_stopped_since(rdp, rdp->dynticks_snap)) {
trace_rcu_fqs(rcu_state.name, rdp->gp_seq, rdp->cpu,
TPS("dti"));
rcu_gpnum_ovf(rnp, rdp);
return 1;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 137559c84309..48ad8b868d83 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static void __sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct
rcu_exp_work *rewp)
unsigned long mask = rdp->grpmask;
retry_ipi:
- if (rcu_dynticks_in_eqs_since(rdp, rdp->exp_dynticks_snap)) {
+ if (rcu_watching_snap_stopped_since(rdp,
rdp->exp_dynticks_snap)) {
mask_ofl_test |= mask;
continue;
}
--
2.40.1
