hi, Zqiang, hi, Paul, On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 08:19:44AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 03:16:25PM +0800, Z qiang wrote:
[...] > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new > > > version of > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> > > > | Closes: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/[email protected] > > > > > > > Please try the following modifications: yes, the following modifications fix the issues we found for 9216c28c6a. thanks! Tested-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c > > index e85db7d5b364..7c7304dee645 100644 > > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c > > @@ -1999,6 +1999,7 @@ static int srcu_module_coming(struct module *mod) > > for (i = 0; i < mod->num_srcu_structs; i++) { > > ssp = *(sspp++); > > ssp->sda = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_data); > > + ssp->srcu_ctrp = &ssp->sda->srcu_ctrs[0]; > > This does look quite promising, so thank you for digging into this!!! > > Looking forward to seeing if it fixes the problem. ;-) > > Thanx, Paul > > > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ssp->sda)) > > return -ENOMEM; > > } > > > > > > > > Thanks > > Zqiang
