On 5/11/2025 5:27 AM, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>
>> @@ -757,6 +766,25 @@ void rcu_request_urgent_qs_task(struct task_struct *t)
>> smp_store_release(per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data.rcu_urgent_qs, cpu), true);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * rcu_set_gpwrap_lag - Set RCU GP sequence overflow lag value.
>> + * @lag_gps: Set overflow lag to this many grace period worth of counters
>> + * which is used by rcutorture to quickly force a gpwrap situation.
>> + * @lag_gps = 0 means we reset it back to the boot-time value.
>> + */
> This kernel-doc comment should be in front of its corresponding function
> prototype so that it is recognized as such.
>
>> +static unsigned long seq_gpwrap_lag = ULONG_MAX / 4;
>> +
> , so this static variable needs to go above the kernel-doc comment.
Thanks a lot Akira, I will fix this now.
- Joel
