Monday, July 17, 2006
If chapter 13 said "to align the bibliographic naming of works with
established ways in which users refer to works" as Mr. Eversberg suggests,
would this
include at least allowing the giving of titles of works of nonroman origin
in their original script? 'Tis a consumation devoutly to be desired. IMO
romanization is done for mainly for the sake of monoscript librarians and is at
best an unhelpful approximation of the original script which catalog users
seeking nonroman works can more readily read and recognize.
Regards,
Jim Agenbroad ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
)
