In the RDA Appendix M examples, 1XX (and I assume 6XX/7XX) designators
are shown in repeating $e (100$ecomposer$esinger). In our OPAC (and I
assume most), this would result in an additional title sequence under
the name having the double designation, as well as a sequence under
the name with each of the single designations. Our practice has been
to have an entry for each designation, e.g., 100$eprintmaker,
700$eartist.
Of the desingators we have most often used, "photographer" (100$e) and
"depicted (6XX$e) seem not to be in the Appendex I lists (I could have
missed it; the designators are not in one alphabetical list, so one
has to hunt).
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
