Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
In AACR2, and in RDA too I believe, a "related work" can be related just about any way the cataloger's discretion desires. In AACR2 (I think) and marc-as-it-is-today (I am confident), there is no way to record the nature of that relationship.
Except by making a note (500, or more specific tag if available) -- which of course separates the information from the access point (or whatever) where the citation or ID is given.
I have encountered one or two specialised catalogues where $e was used to convey such information. In theory terms in $e are supposed to be from the AACR2 list (21.0D1) but that list does not suit specialized purposes even now.
Hal Cain hec...@dml.vic.edu.au
