I think so, but I'm not completely clear on whether the alternate access point will be only the jurisdiction as a 710 in the bibliographic record or also a 410 in the authority record. RDA has this nice word "record" without a log of indication where one is to record the information. Pat
Patricia Sayre-McCoy Head of Law Cataloging and Serials D'Angelo Law Library 1121 E. 60th Street Chicago, IL 60637 p-mc...@uchicago.edu 773-702-9620 (office) 773-702-2885 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 3:23 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] What do I tell the others? Won't it have an alternate 'access point' for the other nation(s) too, and thus be findable at either alphabetical location regardless of which nation comes first in the given translation? On 6/2/2011 4:18 PM, Pat Sayre McCoy wrote: > Adger asked what to tell the reference librarians: > > Mac said "Treaties under first nation (or a single nation if with a group), > regardless of number." > > That should be Treaty authorized access points (what we used to call > author/uniform title entreis) are established under first nation named in the > treaty which could be based on any translation of the treaty if they aren't > identical--so a NAFTA-like treaty could be entered under Canada, the United > States or Mexico. And this only happens if the treaty has not already been > established--at least that was the instruction for post-Test RDA cataloging. > > Pat > > Patricia Sayre-McCoy > Head of Law Cataloging and Serials > D'Angelo Law Library > 1121 E. 60th Street > Chicago, IL 60637 > p-mc...@uchicago.edu > 773-702-9620 (office) > 773-702-2885 (fax)
