On the topic of linking in the earlier thread, what would be the relationship for the Group 1 category for exhibition catalogs in these situations?
a. An exhibition catalog and a commercial publication of the catalog. 775 $i Related (manifestation): <citation>?? b. A travelling exhibition where the catalog stays pretty much the same but the imprint changes to match the various institutions where the exhibition "visits": Also a manifestation relationship? c. And, based on an actual cataloging situation I was working on a few days ago: a travelling exhibition where the catalog content changes significantly (the exhibition at the Yale School of Architecture was about 80 pages and the original catalog was considerably over a 100 pages). Related (expression)? Related (work)? Also, if the author of the catalog essay is presented as the primary creator, but the catalog has numerous reproductions of an artist's works, I would normally choose to make an additional access point for the artist, but what kind of relationship designator would be appropriate? I would like to use $e artist, but would this imply that the artist relationship to the catalog is as a co-creator? "Illustrator" would also seem misleading. What I really want to show is the relationship of the artist to her own works in reproduction. Come to think of it, should the 700 be tagged as an analytic: 700 12 Smith, Susan, $e artist. $t Works. $k Selections? Would that solve the problem? Steven Arakawa Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240 (203)432-8286 steven.arak...@yale.edu
