A compilation of state laws would be a compilation of works by different ... corporate bodies (RDA 6.27.1.4).
If a publication is issued in loose-leaf binders but is not updated, the loose-leaf nature is not mentioned in the record at all. ------------------------------------------ John Hostage Authorities and Database Integrity Librarian Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services Langdell Hall 194 Cambridge, MA 02138 host...@law.harvard.edu<mailto:host...@law.harvard.edu> +(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice) +(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax) From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of MCCUTCHEON, SEVIM Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 08:51 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Corporate authorship; and, Loose-leaf that's not updating I'm working on a book that's a compilation of state laws regarding podiatry. It was put out by the American Podiatry Association. It is in a three-ring binder, so it is loose-leaf. However, the preface, etc. indicates that it is not meant to be updating - it's complete in itself, and not subject to additions, changes, deletions. Two questions: 1. Where in the RDA Toolkit can I find instructions to help me decide whether the corporate body should get a main access point (in a 110) or an added access point (710)? 2. There appear to be no instructions in the RDA Toolkit for the rare situation of a loose leaf that isn't updating. Shall I just mention it in a note? That is, have something like: 300 1 v. (various pagings) 500 Loose-leaf; issued in a 3-ring binder Sevim McCutcheon Catalog Librarian, Asst. Prof. Kent State University Libraries 330-672-1703 lmccu...@kent.edu<mailto:lmccu...@kent.edu>
