Sean Chen said:

>
>I believe the computer media type is now irrelevant and I think that =
>referring to things as needing a computer is not going to be in =
>alignment with how users are doing FISO.
 
I of course agree.
 
I have no argument that "electronic" is better as a media type than
"digital".  More than one attendee of RDA workshops suggested
"digital".

There is however no source for "digital" as a term with an approved
code for $2, as there is for ISBD Area 0's "electronic".  It's simply
a matter of pragmatism.

"Video" as a media type does not have "online resource" listed as a
carrier, so I think using video as a media type with online resource
as carrier, is a mismatch.  The SMD/unit name can be "streaming
video", to get that word in.  

If a patron searches 337 for videos, I doubt streaming ones are
wanted, just as one searching 008/28 for documents doesn't need state
university press publications.  We should consider the utility of what
we code.




   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([email protected])
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

Reply via email to