I understand why RDA thinks it needs to go.

But a "principle" is not a law of nature. And for that matter, RDA states 
representation means, "data describing a resource should reflect".  I think 
there are cases, well understood by catalogers, where we can say, "Well it 
should, but in this case I can better fulfill users' needs by overriding this 
principle."  Even RDA admits, in 0.4.1: "trade-offs sometimes have to be made 
between one principle and another."

We can always use an added title to provide access to the correct version of 
the title, so it's not a matter of losing or gaining access via title indexes.  
The use of [sic] is a well-know practice, used beyond the domain of cataloging, 
for precisely indicating there is an error in the original, and it's right here 
to the left of the [sic].

In my opinion this is an example of RDA-inspired theory overriding the long 
tradition of practical, common sense in cataloging.

--Ben

Benjamin Abrahamse
Cataloging Coordinator
Acquisitions, Metadata and Enterprise Systems
MIT Libraries
617-253-7137

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Joan Wang
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 11:55 AM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Typos in Titles

RDA follows the representation principle. The data describing a resource should 
reflect the resource's representation of itself. The current way seems to be 
more
explicit.

Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Benjamin A Abrahamse 
<babra...@mit.edu<mailto:babra...@mit.edu>> wrote:
I still don't understand why the JSC saw fit to get rid of the device, "[sic]" 
,for bringing gattention to known typos or other minor mistakes in the title.  
I think most users understand what it means, even the ones who don't know Latin.

--Ben

Benjamin Abrahamse
Cataloging Coordinator
Acquisitions, Metadata and Enterprise Systems
MIT Libraries
617-253-7137<tel:617-253-7137>

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca<mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca>] On 
Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 11:44 AM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca<mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Typos in Titles

As far as I understand it, you transcribe what you see.
Just had one of those.  Title was Upnashads.  The record also had a 246.  The 
whole point of a catalog is get the patron to the work he/she wants or is 
seeking, or may find while doing a browse by title on the computer.
Do we want to help the patron or not?
RDA cannot be a cataloging code for catalogers.  It has to be a means to an 
end: "Gee, I am glad I found this.  Thanks."
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Michael Cohen 
<mco...@library.wisc.edu<mailto:mco...@library.wisc.edu>> wrote:
RDA Exercise




A patron asked us to correct a typo in the title page of his
dissertation. The rules are quite clear
on how to handle this situation: transcribe the title page title in 245 and
record the corrected title in 246. But
246 is defined as Varying Form of Title, and a corrected typo is not a
variation of the real title in the same way that spelling out 'and' for &
is. Rather, isn't the corrected (or
intended) title actually the title of the Work (instead of the Manifestation)
and therefore shouldn't it be recorded in 240 instead of 246?



 Please explain the flaws in this logic.

--
________________________________________________________
Michael L. Cohen
Interim Head of Cataloging
General Library System, University of Wisconsin-Madison
324C Memorial Library
728 State Street
Madison, WI 53706-1494
Phone: (608) 262-3246<tel:%28608%29%20262-3246> Fax: (608) 
262-4861<tel:%28608%29%20262-4861>
Email: mco...@library.wisc.edu<mailto:mco...@library.wisc.edu>



--
Gene Fieg
Cataloger/Serials Librarian
Claremont School of Theology
gf...@cst.edu<mailto:gf...@cst.edu>

Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not represent 
or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information or content 
contained in this forwarded email.  The forwarded email is that of the original 
sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School of Theology or 
Claremont Lincoln University.  It has been forwarded as a courtesy for 
information only.



--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax

Reply via email to