At a NACO workshop on RDA authority records held last month, a trainer
from COIN reiterated the provision at DCM, Z1, 370, General, para. 1, a).
Then, a reminder was added that, for placement under authority field 370s,
it should be "Korea" and *not* "Korea (South)" [or *not* "Korea (North)"
for that matter]. Cf.
http://rdaandcjkworkshop.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/64888348/RDA%20Authorities%20CEAL%202013%20final.ppt
slide #41, last line
===================================================================
Hideyuki Morimoto
Japanese Cataloger
C.V. Starr East Asian Library
300 Kent Hall, mail code 3901
Columbia University Voice: +1-212-854-1510
1140 Amsterdam Ave. Fax: +1-212-662-6286
New York, NY 10027
U.S.A. Electronic Mail: hm2...@columbia.edu
===================================================================
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, John Hostage wrote:
We came across another issue with putting place names in the 370 in the form
used in a qualifier. There is a place established as:
Linyi (Shandong Sheng, China : South)
How does that get entered in 370 $e? Linyi, Shandong Sheng, China ?
What happens with the ?South” part? (There is another Linyi in the northern
part of the province.)
Is the place established correctly according to RDA? It?s complicated by
the fact that the authority record seems to conflate the Shi (2nd order
administrative division) with the populated place.
------------------------------------------
John Hostage
Authorities and Database Integrity Librarian //
Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services //
Langdell Hall 194 //
Cambridge, MA 02138
host...@law.harvard.edu
+(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice)
+(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax)
