The Google Books entry for The Director's Event shows that the sections of the book are headed, "Abraham Polonsky", "Budd Boetticher", etc., so it does seem that this resource consists of five quite separate and substantial interviews, each with a different creator-level interviewee, in which case I would certainly treat it as a compilation.
The RDA example shows Boetticher first, but he seems to be a creator for only the second interview, and it would therefore be odd to make a name-title for the whole resource using his name. (In fact the cover, seen online, shows the interviewers' names first, with the interviewees listed below more or less as contents; so presumably the RDA example's order is taken from the title page, which I have not seen.) Best wishes, Bernadette ******************* Bernadette O'Reilly Catalogue Support Librarian 01865 2-77134 Bodleian Libraries, Osney One Building Osney Mead Oxford OX2 0EW. ******************* -----Original Message----- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of John Hostage Sent: 06 May 2013 17:18 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/title added entries? That depends on whether 'The director's event' is to be considered a compilation of works by different persons, etc. (6.27.1.4) or a collaborative work (6.27.1.3). I think it's the latter, so the first-named of those creators would be used in the AAP. ------------------------------------------ John Hostage Authorities and Database Integrity Librarian // Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services // Langdell Hall 194 // Cambridge, MA 02138 host...@law.harvard.edu +(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice) +(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax) > -----Original Message----- > > There is also an example in 19.2.1.3 'Two or More Persons, Families, > or Corporate Bodies Responsible for the Creation of the Work > Performing Different Roles' for 'The director's way' which seems to be > a compilation (interviews with five different people), so presumably > would have a title- only AAP, but nevertheless has creator-level > access points for all five interviewees (and for the two > interviewers). 19.1.2 seems to confirm that the creators of the > individual works in an aggregate of works by different creators should be listed as creators for the aggregate. >
