Many thanks for the examples.
Now I see what sort of records would require two modes of issuance. I
suppose cases like these are not very frequent, though.
Heidrun
On 19.05.2013 23:22, JSC Secretary wrote:
Other possibilities:
-- a description for a monograph that is updated by an annual volume
without its own separate title;
-- a serial having one issue each year that is an updating loose-leaf
Judy Kuhagen
JSC Secretary
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Adam Schiff <asch...@u.washington.edu
<mailto:asch...@u.washington.edu>> wrote:
LC-PCC PS for 0.0:
Supplementary Materials
LC practice: Create separate records for a main work and a
supplementary work if the supplementary work is not issued at the
same time as the main work, or if it shows important differences
in titles or statements of responsibility from those appearing in
the main work.
Also, catalog separately all supplements, etc., to serials except for:
1. Indexes, and
2. Supplements, etc., that have titles that are more like
descriptions than true titles, or because the supplement, etc., is
usable only in conjunction with the main work.
Relate separately cataloged supplements, etc., to the main work
following the guidelines in Chapter 25 (Related works).
Serial Supplements to Other Serials
LC practice/PCC practice: Create a separate bibliographic record
for a serial supplement to another serial if the supplement does
not update that related serial and carries its own designation
system that is distinct and independent from that used by the
related serial. Give a MARC 772 field for the related serial. In
addition, provide an authorized access point for the related
serial unless the supplement has a common title that is identical
to the title proper of the related serial. On the bibliographic
record for the related serial, give a MARC 770 field for the
supplement.
Other serial supplements should be noted on the bibliographic
records for the related serials. Provide access points for the
supplement whenever the titles are distinctive.
Indexes to Serials
LC practice/PCC practice: Generally indicate the presence of an
index to a serial on the bibliographic record for the serial being
indexed. If, however, the index is published separately and is not
issued by the entity responsible for the serial being indexed,
create a separate bibliographic record (monograph or serial as
appropriate) for the index. Create a separate bibliographic record
also whenever the index covers two or more different serials. (A
serial represented by one or more descriptions (see RDA 1.6.2) is
regarded as one serial.)
-----Original Message----- From: J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 1:28 PM
To: asch...@u.washington.edu <mailto:asch...@u.washington.edu>
Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca <mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] More than one mode of issuance?
Sdam said regarding multiple modes:
Perhaps a single unit with supplementary volumes?
enember "dash entries"?
Don't we now do separate records? Has that changed with
RDA?
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca
<mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca>)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
--
---------------------
Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A.
Stuttgart Media University
Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
www.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi
