I would certainly put relationship designators for works at the beginning of 
the string. It doesn't make any sense at the end, and for display purposes it 
needs to be at the front. I suppose you could program your system to flip it to 
the front but why, when you can just as easily put it at the front in the first 
place? In my cataloging I always put this type of relationship designator at 
the front of the field. Perhaps LC has some sort of indexing problem, but it 
seems to me it's a lot easier to program the index to ignore subfield $i at the 
beginning of a string in 7XX than it is to program the system to flip the 
display so that the subfield $i, which you put at the end, displays at the 
front.

Bob

Robert L. Maxwell
Head, Special Collections and Formats Catalog Dept.
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
(801)422-5568

"We should set an example for all the world, rather than confine ourselves to 
the course which has been heretofore pursued"--Eliza R. Snow, 1842.
________________________________
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] on behalf of Sian Woolcock 
[sian.woolc...@adelaide.edu.au]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 8:54 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designators for related expressions, works 
etc for a music score

Thank you everyone for your responses, they were very helpful.

One further question if I may. There seems to be some confusion between where 
these relationship designators are positioned. In my example, as well as Andra 
Patterson’s and Adams the relationship designators are positioned at the 
beginning of field i.e.

700 12 ‡i Contains (expression): ‡a Neruda, Pablo, ‡d 1904-1973. ‡t Poems. ‡k 
Selections. ‡l English.

However, in the LC example link Daniel kindly provided the i subfield is 
positioned at the end i.e.

|a García Lorca, Federico, |d 1898-1936. |t Casa de Bernarda Alba. |i Based on 
(work):

Which is correct?

Kind regards

Siân

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Paradis Daniel
Sent: Thursday, 6 June 2013 11:20 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designators for related expressions, works 
etc for a music score

I agree with Andra that “Musical setting of (work)” is not appropriate because 
the Neruda poems have been used as an inspiration for the musical work but not 
actually set to music. A better designator would be “based on (work)” (in which 
case the access point(s) would not include the subfield $l) or “based on 
(expression)”, if you think that the composer drew his inspiration from the 
English translation of the poems and not from the original version. This LC 
record provides an example: http://lccn.loc.gov/2013560310. This record is also 
an illustration of LC policy regarding instrumental works that are based on, 
inspired by, etc., one or two literary works (see LC-PCC PS for 25.0 
http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp25#<http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp25>).

Daniel Paradis

Bibliothécaire
Direction du traitement documentaire des collections patrimoniales
Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec

2275, rue Holt
Montréal (Québec) H2G 3H1
Téléphone : 514 873-1101, poste 3721
Télécopieur : 514 873-7296
daniel.para...@banq.qc.ca<mailto:daniel.para...@banq.qc.ca>
http://www.banq.qc.ca<http://www.banq.qc.ca>

Avis de confidentialité
Ce courriel est une communication confidentielle et l’information qu’il 
contient est réservée à l’usage exclusif du destinataire. Si vous n’êtes pas le 
destinataire visé, vous n’avez aucun droit d’utiliser cette information, de la 
copier, de la distribuer ou de la diffuser. Si cette communication vous a été 
transmise par erreur, veuillez la détruire et nous en aviser immédiatement par 
courriel.

________________________________
De : Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] De la part de Andra Patterson
Envoyé : 5 juin 2013 21:13
À : RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca<mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca>
Objet : Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designators for related expressions, works etc 
for a music score

Hi Siân,

Here are  my thoughts, for what they're worth!

Yes, I think it is useful to record the relationship between Neruda's work and 
Daughtrey's concerto. This is recorded as a relationship to a related work 
(25.1) and it could be recorded as an unstructured description in the 500 
rather than in 500 and 700 (see the 2nd example in the final box of examples at 
25.1.1.3).

As you point out, the text of the poems does not form part of the work, so the 
relationship designator "musical setting of (work)" is not appropriate. Using 
an unstructured description to record the relationship eliminates the need for 
a relationship designator. You could record a whole-part relationship as a 700 
to record the fact that the poems are contained in the resource, using a 
relationship designator from J.3.4:

100 1     ‡a Daughtrey, Nathan ‡e composer.
240 10  ‡a Concertos, ‡m vibraphone, percussion ensemble
245 10  ‡a Concerto for vibraphone & percussion ensemble / ‡c Nathan Daughtrey.
500        ‡a "The two-movement work draws inspiration from two opposing poems 
by Pablo Neruda that depict night and day"--Program notes.
700 12 ‡i Contains (expression): ‡a Neruda, Pablo, ‡d 1904-1973. ‡t Poems. ‡k 
Selections. ‡l English.

I apologise in advance if my thoughts are incorrect - I'm happy to be corrected!

Best wishes,
Andra

Andra Patterson | Team Leader, Cataloguing Team 2
National Library of New Zealand
PO Box 1467, Wellington 6140
Email: andra.patter...@dia.govt.nz<mailto:andra.patter...@dia.govt.nz> | Direct 
Dial: +64 4 460 2858 | Internal extension: 3258 |  http://natlib.govt.nz/

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Sian Woolcock
Sent: Thursday, 6 June 2013 12:02 p.m.
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: [RDA-L] Relationship designators for related expressions, works etc 
for a music score

Hi everyone,

Hoping I could get some advice on a music score I am currently cataloguing in 
RDA.

My score is a concerto for Vibraphone and Percussion ensemble. The program 
notes written in the score include two poems by Pablo Neruda (written in 
English) and the statement “The two-movement work draws inspiration from two 
opposing poems by Pablo Neruda that depict night and day”. The poems do not 
form any part of the actual music of the score (so would not be performed as 
they are neither narrated or sung). Whilst they will not be part of any 
performance of the score I want to make reference to Neruda as the poems were 
considered significant enough inspiration to the composer that their text was 
printed in the program notes. My questions are


1.       Am I correct in my assumption that Neruda’s work/inspiration should be 
recorded in the record as a related expression?

2.       Is a name title 700 entry (see below) the best way to do this?

3.       Is the relationship designator I have used from Appendix J (J 2.2) of 
the toolkit the appropriate one given that the text does not form part of the 
actual work? (i.e. it’s not a libretto) -  ‡i musical setting of (work). If not 
what is the alternative?


100 1     ‡a Daughtrey, Nathan ‡e composer.

240 1 0  ‡a Concertos, ‡m vibraphone, percussion ensemble
245 1 0  ‡a Concerto for vibraphone & percussion ensemble / ‡c Nathan Daughtrey.
500        ‡a "The two-movement work draws inspiration from two opposing poems 
by Pablo Neruda that depict night and day." -- Program notes.

700 1 2  ‡i musical setting of (work) ‡a Neruda, Pablo, ‡d 1904-1973. ‡t Poems. 
‡k Selections. ‡l English.

Apologies in advance if my questions are a bit too basic for the forum but I am 
fairly new to cataloguing. Thanks for any guidance you can offer.


Kind regards

Siân

Siân Woolcock
Assistant Metadata Librarian (Music)
University of Adelaide Library
The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005
Ph    : +61 8 8313 5225
e-mail : sian.woolc...@adelaide.edu.au<mailto:sian.woolc...@adelaide.edu.au>

[UoA_Uni_Lib_col_horz_sig]

CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
-----------------------------------------------------------
This email message is intended only for the addressee(s)
and contains information which may be confidential and/or
copyright.  If you are not the intended recipient please
do not read, save, forward, disclose, or copy the contents
of this email. If this email has been sent to you in error,
please notify the sender by reply email and delete this
email and any copies or links to this email completely and
immediately from your system.  No representation is made
that this email is free of viruses.  Virus scanning is
recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.


<<inline: image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to