No, the element is just copyright date. Only a date (preceded by (c) or
(p) is recorded in 264 _4 $c.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
asch...@u.washington.edu
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Karen Nelson wrote:
What Dana has just posted is very helpful (great timing!) and I have just
noticed that Mac answered a very similar one from me last time I was fiddling
with some RDA bibs. Should've checked my saved replies, note to self.
But I am still wondering about the issue of the author holding copyright ...
does her name go in the second 264, if a second one is kept? Haven't seen it
done so far.
Karen
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Karen Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 10:33 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] another (basic) 264 query
I am just getting my toes wet with some RDA copy cataloguing based on LC bibs.
Looking at the bib for Louise Erdrich's Round House, LCCN 2012005381.
There is a 260 in this one still. I want to edit it to 264(s). So far, I have
included:
264_1|aNew York, NY :|bHarper,|c[2012] or maybe [2012?]
264_4 |ccopyright 2012
My queries:
Since the author is identified on the tp verso as copyright holder, do I
include her in the second (copyright) 264? I don't think I have seen that done,
but does not to do so imply that Harper has the copyright?
Should the square-bracketed inferred date in the first 264 have a question
mark, or not. LC had it in 260 without copyright symbol. Haven't checked the
publisher's website yet.
This level of question will give someone a laugh, if nothing else.
Karen