On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:05 AM, M. E. <m.k.e.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see that portion of the 008 field listed here (< > http://bibframe.org/vocab/Instance.html>), which is odd since I think it > would square pretty easily with the 260 $a/264 -1 $a given on that list. > I should add that the BIBFRAME group is probably still working on this point. With multiple place-names possible with the imprint and the first one listed coded in the 008, there may be other issues to tackle, like matching the codes in the 044 with the list in the 260/264. Mark K. Ehlert Minitex <http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>
