I think in RDA you would supply: 264 _1 [Place of publication not identified] : $b [publisher not identified], $c [date of publication not identified] 264 _3 [Place of printing] : $b [place of printing], $c [date of printing]
And then you would include a 776 field with: 776 08 $i Reproduction of (manifestation): $a Place of original publication online : publisher of original online, date of original online. Adam Schiff Principal Cataloger University of Washington Libraries asch...@uw.edu On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:32:23 -0700 From: J. McRee Elrod <m...@slc.bc.ca> Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access <RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA local printouts Deborah said:I agree with you, Michelle--I think we might be looking at Production = rather than Publication + Printing. I don't think you can put the = Publication details for the original in the record for the reproduction.The library is neither producing, publishing, nor reproducing the material; it is printing out a published item, making no contribution to the intellectual or artistic content. The only imprint data of importance to the patron is who published the material and when. They would be largely unconcerned with who printed it and when. To enter the library as producer or publisher would be *very* misleading. Let's please keep in mind *why* we create bibliographic records, and be guided by patron needs. __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca) {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/ ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Adam L. Schiff Principal Cataloger University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 Seattle, WA 98195-2900 (206) 543-8409 (206) 685-8782 fax asch...@u.washington.edu http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
