I agree that we need something to cover the Related Manifestation aspect,
but I rather like your idea of also adding the carrier attribute 'Production
method'. What made you change your mind about using this element in this
situation?
'Production method: photocopy' or 'Production method: printout' both seem
very appropriate for the kinds of reproductions we are considering
('printout' for this particular example).
3.9.1.3 provides 'photocopy' in its list, and allows the use of another
concise term or terms to indicate the production method, so maybe we could
propose adding 'printout' to that list?
I see that the PCC proposal form that Adam pointed out is only for
Relationship Designators; maybe we could persuade PCC to add another form
for 'vocabulary terms'?
Deborah
Deborah Fritz
TMQ, Inc.
(321) 676-1904
debo...@marcofquality.com
www.marcofquality.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:59 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA local printouts
>Also getting into new territory for me, would the RDA Manuscript-related
elements (RDA 3.9.2) apply for a >single cataloged print-out of a published
electronic resource?
>Production Method for Manuscript: printout
Scratch that idea. Better to apply the basic RDA concept of choosing the
right kind of element-- an attribute element or a relationship element.
The use of "printout" here is as an attribute of the manifestation. Since
there is a related manifestation element at play here, it's better to use
"printout" as a relationship sub-element-- a designator in this case-- under
the Related Manifestation element. Since such a designator doesn't exist
yet, so it would have to be created.
Printout
Related Manifestation:
Printout of (manifestation): Author. Title. Publication Statement of
original
Thomas Brenndorfer
Guelph Public Library
