James said:
>But, if I had to make decisions for a *non-library* institution for what
>to do with our institution's metadata, would I prefer RDA/FRBR, which is
>semi-incoherent, expensive, difficult to implement and has yet to prove
>any advantages, or would I rather choose schema.org, which is easier,
>clearer and cheaper, so that I then could put my efforts into SEO?
Not to mention RDA's failure to support the description of objects which
are manufactured or distributed, but not published. These would make up
the bulk of a musem collection, for example, as opposed to published text.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
