Thanks for bringing this to my attention Diane.
Option 1 is the correct intention of my statement. When replying to a discussion thread that started on the RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA address, users will need to manually direct their reply to the new address (rd...@ala.org). And of course this would apply beginning on December 27th. Jamie James Hennelly Managing Editor ALA Digital Reference 1-800-545-2433, ext 5051, or 312-280-5051 jhenne...@ala.org From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Diane Hillmann Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:40 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] About the coming transfer of RDA-L Jamie: Just a clarification on one statement in your message: On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:14 PM, James Hennelly <jhenne...@ala.org> wrote: * Beginning on Dec. 27th, replies to discussion threads that started on the RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA address should be redirected to rd...@ala.org. There are at least two ways to parse this one. Is it: 1. Replies to threads that originated from the old address 'should be redirected' [manually by the reply-er] to the new address [meaning that we have to pay attention to avoid having messages rejected] 2. Replies to threads that originated from the old address 'should be redirected' [automatically by the system] to the new address [meaning we can stop worrying and just let those replies fly] Diane To unsubscribe from RDA-L send an e-mail to the following address from the address you are subscribed under to: lists...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca In the body of the message: SIGNOFF RDA-L To unsubscribe from RDA-L send an e-mail to the following address from the address you are subscribed under to: lists...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca In the body of the message: SIGNOFF RDA-L
