Hello, As I dig into the persistence options available for RDFLib it seems like the only one that clearly offers transaction support is the SPARQL store. I am also very happy to see that the "dirty reads" option is available in the snapshot version, which is fundamental for me to perform atomic updates.
By looking at the code for the Sleepycat connector I am not clear about whether transactions are supported. If they are not, is there a reason for that (beyond that not being a priority)? If I were to extend the Sleepycat store class, or the Kyoto Cabinet one, or even create a new one for a DB I prefer (e.g. I'd like to do that for LMDB) are there any caveats that I need to be aware of? Thanks for your advice. Stefano -- http://github.com/RDFLib --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rdflib-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/0c136641-24be-4ddb-924b-70613d2e3516%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
