On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:13:09 Matthew Flaschen wrote: > Dominic wrote: > > But I am not sure what official sanctioning there could be; Canonical > > take no responsibility for private repositories, emphasizing 'you should > > be happy that you trust the author of the package'. This is something of > > a problem IMO. > > I disagree. The whole point of PPA is that there is no need for > Canonical's approval, which obviously streamlines things. > > However, it could still be official in the sense that it's approved by > the rdiff-backup project, just not by Canonical.
Thanks you! That was exactly my original intent. I just wasn't sure if it had gotten thru to everyone or not :) // Andreas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
