Thats sounds good, I too liked rdiff-backup, found some issues with it, worked around those and haven't really touched it in a while, but seeing as we are talking backups, always good to know that somebody is looking after the code.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Dominic Raferd <domi...@timedicer.co.uk>wrote: > Alex, I believe Daniel Miller is working on a new project inspired by > rdiff-backup, I think he will post here when it is ready for others to try. > I don't think its archives will be compatible with rdiff-backup. > > For most of us rdiff-backups works and works very well indeed. Users like > myself would really appreciate some generous volunteer (who understands the > code, unlike me!) creating and then maintaining a fork (which in due course > could become rdiff-backup2?), so that ongoing bugs can be addressed. I'm not > sure whether it would be best to start from 1.2.8 (stable), 1.3.3 (unstable, > but I haven't heard of many problems) or CVS. > > Dominic > http://www.timedicer.co.uk/ > > > On 28/04/2011 01:33, Alexander Samad wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Wondering if the application is being maintained - bug fixes etc >> >> Alex >> > > _______________________________________________ > rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users > Wiki URL: > http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki >
_______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
