Hi there Adrian,
Why should splitting the table vertically make a difference?
Am I not correct in thinking that would then require a join, which is
expensive (especially on 8M rows) ?
My FS is local, and my indices are quite large
db=# \di+ idx_ligand_rdkitmol;
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Table | Size | Description
--------+---------------------+-------+-------+--------+---------+-------------
public | idx_ligand_rdkitmol | index | jpebe | ligand | 5030 MB |
(1 row)
db=# \di+ idx_ligand_morganbv;
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Table | Size | Description
--------+---------------------+-------+-------+--------+---------+-------------
public | idx_ligand_morganbv | index | jpebe | ligand | 1645 MB |
(1 row)
But Greg is right (!) running the query a second time resulted in much
faster performance (11285.886ms as opposed to the original
193973.253ms)
Of course if you change the smiles string, than nothing is cached and
it takes ages again...
Interested,
JP
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
