On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 1:39 PM Ivan Tubert-Brohman < ivan.tubert-broh...@schrodinger.com> wrote:
> Perhaps using x3 instead (means "number of ring bonds") would work for > your purposes? > Nevermind, x3 won't exclude the fused 4-atom rings from your first example. I'll let you know if I think of some other way. :-)
_______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing list Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
