On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 1:39 PM Ivan Tubert-Brohman <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Perhaps using x3 instead (means "number of ring bonds") would work for
> your purposes?
>

Nevermind, x3 won't exclude the fused 4-atom rings from your first example.
I'll let you know if I think of some other way. :-)
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to