Michael, So how many times do they have to replace the modules to get 10% more energy....;-)
Bill. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Welch Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 9:54 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] crystalline VS uni-solar and beyond Michael Welch wrote at 09:32 AM 11/4/2008: >3. The amorphous modules performed 4% less than the crystalline -- until Uni-Solar replaced the modules a couple of years back, and now they outperform the crystalline modules by about 4%. Dangit. That last figure is 2%, for outperforming the crystalline after the Uni-Solar replacements. _______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org _______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
