I agree with Kelly and others that all grounding electrodes should be bonded together. My experience in lightning country with PV systems with a ground rod at the array and separate ground rod at the BOS and no wire connecting the ground rods has always resulted in fried equipment. The same systems, after they were repaired and the ground rods were connected together, survived every lightning storm for several years. I have found that the same holds true for any equipment or structure - good earth grounds all connected together create a grounding field and can create a cone of protection. Properly grounded equipment with all grounding electrodes connected together generally survive lightning storms and have been known to survive direct lightning strikes.
Joel Davidson ----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Crise To: RE-wrenches Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] 690.47D (revisited) Kelly, It is my understanding that all types of grounding electrodes, whether supplementary or not, for lightning protection or PV array grounding shall be bonded together to form the grounding electrode system. (250.106, 690.47(A) which sends you to 250.50, NFPA 780-2008 4.14). If you do not do this and you do get a lightning strike or for that matter any high frequency signal injected onto a grounding electrode you will get what they call a ground potential rise onto one part of the system. With the other separate grounding electrode not having this same signal because of them not being common, you will have a potential difference between the two separate electrodes even though they are both in the ground. The ground (earth) is actually a very poor conductor when it comes to high levels of high frequency current Hopefully this helps, Brian NABCEP Certified PV Installer To contact Brian L Crise: Address: 16021 NE Airport Way Portland OR, 97230 Office Phone: (503) 262-9991 x.5054 e-mail: bcr...@nietc.org On Jun 5, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Kelly Keilwitz, Whidbey Sun & Wind wrote: Mark, I don't think that the 690.47D "PV GE" is part of the premises AC & DC ground electrode system. IMO, in order to function to properly as “enhanced protection from lightning induced surges” as described in the 690.47(D) section note in the 2008 NEC Handbook, the “optional supplementary grounding electrode” should not be connected to the premises system AC and DC grounding electrodes, as shown in Exhibit 690.6 of the Handbook. If an additional #8 (per 250.166) is bonded to the premises AC/DC system GE, it's path will be parallel with, and redundant to, the existing EGC. This could set up the potential for an inductive ground loop, which might cause more damage to the system during a lightning strike than it would prevent. If the “additional electrode for array grounding” (PV GE) of 690.47D is not required, then the PV GEC of that section should not be required. Of course, these opinions are academic. What I really want to know is what the AHJ's think! Any of you have to deal with this, yet? Thanks, -Kelly Kelly Keilwitz, P.E. Whidbey Sun & Wind, LLC Renewable Energy Systems NABCEP Certified PV Installer WA Electrical Administrator #KEILWKM923RB 987 Wanamaker Rd. Coupeville, WA, 98239 360.678.7131 sunw...@whidbeysunwind.com WA Electrical Contractor #WHIDBSW920MS WA General Contractor #WHIDBSW946M1 On 6/5/09 10:01 AM, "Mark Frye" <ma...@berkeleysolar.com> wrote: Kelly, The question is, if the AJH had required you to run the new array DC GEC directly to an additional DC array GE, would that new DC GE system need to be bonded with the exisitng AC GE system with a bonding wire other than the new EGC running from the array to new DC GE? Unfortunately, NEC 2008 is not clear about this with respect to the new DC array GE. That leaves us with only the general NEC requirement that all premise GE's be bonded into a single system. So the total effect of the new 690.47D, assuming that the "prcaticable" location for the new DC array GE is not within 6 ft of the exisiting AC GE, is this: A new DC array GEC must run directly from the array to a new DC GE system and and a new bonding jumper must be run from the new DC GE system to the exisitng AC GE system. It the new DC GE system can be the same as the existing AC GE by virtue of it proximity (less than 6 ft) to the practiable location, then the ne DC array GEC must still be run directly to exist GE system which is now the AC/DC GE system. Mark Frye Berkeley Solar Electric Systems 303 Redbud Way Nevada City, CA 95959 (530) 401-8024 www.berkeleysolar.com _______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org