Chinese quality will improve and price is important, but I think that doing 
business with people who you trust and respect comes first. Some of you 
remember Bill Lamb. The Wm. Lamb Company was the world's first PV 
distributorship. Bill helped a lot of us get started in the business. I learned 
a lot about PV and business in general working for Bill. Here's a Bill Lamb 
true story. Before moving to Camarillo, Arco Solar was in Chatsworth about 16 
miles from the Wm. Lamb Company so Arco referred a lot of customers to us. In 
1983 or 1984, Arco sent three Arab gentlemen to us. They selected about $50,000 
in solar modules and other equipment which was a big sale in those days. One of 
the men pulled out cash and told Bill that they plan to buy a lot more solar 
equipment and will buy it all from him if he did not sell to Israel. Bill's 
reaction was immediate. It was the only time I ever saw him get angry. He told 
the men to go to hell and that he would never sell anything to them. Then he 
walked out the building, got in his car, and drove away leaving me with the 
three shocked men. They asked me what to do. I told them that Bill was the boss 
and had the final word so they left without buying anything. A few hours later, 
Bill returned and I asked him if he refused to sell to the Arabs because they 
were boycotting Israel. Bill said, "It's not just about Israel. I refuse to do 
business with dictators."
Joel Davidson
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Keith Cronin 
  To: RE-wrenches 
  Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 1:45 PM
  Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Chinese solar cells and modules and pricing


  PV enthusiasts- 

  Perhaps a fresh perspective on these products deserves some attention after 
the last few thoughts shared by Bill & Joel, who are industry respected 
stalwarts that deserve and receive alot of respect from me and the rest of us.
  As some of us grew up when we thought Japanese types of products- from toys 
to cars where less durable, they eventually created fantastic products to be 
the envy of the world. Just look at most electronic gadgets and cars 10 years 
ago to draw some distinctions.
  A new dawn has arrived, which parallels this analogy. The Chinese have been 
able to import the technology and systems to develop world class modules. using 
alot of the pick and place robots the other contenders are using. SunPower 
makes the lions share of their products in the Philippines and I recall the 
building is so large and long, that you can see the curvature of the earth.
  Just as the computer revolution started in the US, most of the parts and 
silicon platforms have been made in Asia. Sure it can take time to polish the 
products, but this is inevitable. China will continue to thrive and deliver 
competitive products that will have quality attributes for years to come as 
their population gets increased education and awareness of what the world solar 
stage demands- inexpensive modules.

  The PVUSA facility was circa 1986 and sold to David for a buck in 1997. Alot 
of innovation and understanding came from those formative years and we as an 
industry are all grateful. As Joel points out, if you are going with these 
types of products, "check in" with your clients, as this is one of the ways to 
monitor any signs of degradation. Yes, a Barrons report shared with me says 
many of the similar things about our Chinese manus' thats hard to ignore: 


  June 3, 2009, 1:53 pm
  China Solar Vendors Slash Module Prices, Analyst Says
  Posted by Eric Savitz 
  Chinese solar vendors are offering modules for prices far below what most 
investors likely suspect, according to Hapoalim Securities analyst Gordon 
Johnson.

  In a research note today, Johnson asserts that some of his “most trusted 
industry contacts” say that companies like Yingli (YGE), Suntech (STP) and 
Trina Solar (TSL) are offering modules for sale at $1.70-$1.80/watt, or 
1.21-1.28 Euros/watt. He notes that at the recent Intersolar conference, the 
talk was that solar modules were priced in the 1.60-1.70 Euros/watt range.

  Johnson contends that U.S. investors may be underestimating the ability of 
Chinese solar module companies to significantly lower their non-silicon costs - 
specifically, by cutting wages. He writes that “we are hearing that Chinese 
solar module factory workers are willing to work for little-to-no-pay” in order 
to improve their company’s competitiveness and “as a matter of national pride.” 
According to Johnson, volumes available at the lower price levels is 
effectively unlimited.

  Johnson, who already had been bearish on the sector, notes that there are 1.5 
GW of solar module inventory in the channel, and that Spain, which in 2008 
accounted for nearly 50% of global module consumption, “has basically gone to 
zero.” His view: “At the risk of stating the obvious, this does not bode well 
for U.S./European solar module vendors given the commodity underpinnings which 
define this space,” he writes. “Assuming these prices stock, we believe solar 
industry fundamentals are in bigger trouble than we expected this year.”

  Johnson specifically advises taking short positions in SunPower (SPWRA), 
Q-Cells (QCE.DE), First Solar (FSLR) and SolarWorld (SWV.DE).




  So- where does this leave us?




  Clearly this trend is going to continue and perhaps look at it another way. 
If mod pricing will continue to decline over the next 10 years and infinity and 
there are a few companies out there who will fail with their products, we will 
have a declining cost basis for our client base to purchase new products at 
perhaps a cost delta that is palatable and I envision below dirty power rates. 
Will it be the $1 watt? This would be a huge milestone and we could be there 
with growth and innovation leading the race. Increased cell efficiencies with a 
new mix of products yet to be birthed......





  I am not trying to justify bad manufacturers from pumping out poor products, 
but GM did it for quite a few years in the race to compete and now we own (as a 
country or the treasury) 60% of the company, which could also be worthless 
depending upon the tempo of our economy.




  The irony is everywhere. We used to be dissapointed that the Chinese 
government had their hands in their private industries and where constantly 
meddling, but we are not doing the same- autos, banking and insurance to name a 
few.




  In light of this, even looking at a companies finacials, and peering into the 
Chinese manus balance sheets could also be unclear, again, as the Barrons 
reports suggests this might be not telling the whole story.





  So, the cost per watt conversation is the one we will have for some time, as 
this is the leading metric and I think it is more than just a few pennies per 
watt, but the delta is significantly wider. On the residential scale, of the 
2-5kW range, not as influencial, but do a 50kW and north of this and the impact 
is tangible. in our free market economy you can understand a company offering 
these products and really stinging the company offering Solarworld (oh, wait - 
Arco, Siemens, Shell) for a particular project. Mods represent the largest 
piece of the solar pies project costs, so it is plausible to look for 
alternatives.





  A way to navitage through this minefield of uncertanty, is we need as an 
industry to perhaps move the conversation from cost per watt to a performance 
based reality. If we buy power from the utility per kW, my vision is some day 
we can orchestrate the same. This will greatly improve our field of interest 
and everyone benefits when performace meets the expectation, regardless of 
system size. Our treasury, at the fed and state levels will pay proportionatly 
for actual energy created, levelizing the conversation about subsidies with 
real time, empirical data to back up the efficacy of what we are doing.




  For a better tomorrow~




  Keith





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: Joel Davidson <joel.david...@sbcglobal.net>
  To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
  Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2009 7:11:11 AM
  Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Chinese solar cells and modules and pricing

  I have a lot of respect for Bill, not just because he sometimes agrees with 
me (smile), but because he worked at Davis California PVUSA and other places 
and saw a lot of innovative, but flawed PV. He knows first-hand that dozens of 
PV companies and/or products have come and gone in the search for the $0.10/kWh 
holy grail.

  I wish the Chinese well, but am concerned about the wisdom of buying Chinese 
modules. On the one hand, I welcome China into the league of nations and 
support their progress toward democracy. Hopefully, Chinese national and local 
dictators will grow up and become civilized. On the other hand, latest reports 
from China, according to Hapoalim Securities analyst Gordon Johnson, is that 
Chinese solar module factory workers are willing to work for little-to-no-pay. 
There's a big difference between "volunteering" in the war of economic 
imperialism against the West and the volunteer work Wrenches perform in their 
communities and around the world.

  But back to nuts-and-volts. Last year China became the largest producer of 
crystalline silicon solar cells. Although some companies admit that their 
modules are made in China, few companies with factories outside of China say 
they build their modules with cells outsourced from China. This is not all bad 
news because crystalline silicon cells are some of the most stable products 
ever made. However, you do have to protect yourself and your customers' 
investments, especially if you are a California contractor required to give 
10-year system warranties. I recommend getting each module's IV curve, keeping 
the IV curves in your customer file, performing pre-installation tests (at 
least Voc and Isc), and performing annual systems inspections and tests. Look 
for cell-tab corrosion, front and backsheet delamination, and discoloration. 
Most customers will pay to see you once a year if your manner is professional 
and your service charge is reasonable.

  Joel Davidson


  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Brooks" <billbroo...@yahoo.com>
  To: "'RE-wrenches'" <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
  Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 10:19 PM
  Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Chinese solar cells and modules and pricing


  > All,
  > 
  > How many of these Chinese manufacturers will still be in existence in 5
  > years (probably less than half)? Are you really willing to risk a company
  > and reputation for a few pennies per watt? Certainly several of the big
  > companies are likely to survive, but you are playing a new game of "Chinese
  > roulette" with many of these companies.
  > 
  > These are manufacturing companies, not stable companies with a long past and
  > future. The value proposition is so dramatically different from a major
  > company to one of these Chinese manufacturing companies to make the
  > comparison nearly idiotic. Most of the installers using these products have
  > way more guts than I have. Many will find their guts on the ground as the
  > get disemboweled by bad choices. Don't you love the imagery.
  > 
  > Yingli's one of the big companies now, they might survive. I'm sure they are
  > learning every month that they proceed how to better manufacture modules.
  > They have been a player for two years--no major problems--YET. How does a
  > year in the field show that a company is doing everything correctly? Oh, and
  > their fuse size is 10 amps on an 8 amp Isc module. They obviously are not
  > all that sophisticated.
  > 
  > Folks, you need to let the dumb contractors screw up and buy the cheap
  > stuff. Now, more than ever, you have to sell on brand. The more the young
  > Chinese stuff gets in the field and craps out, the worse our industry is
  > going to take it on the chin in the public eye. It's just not worth the
  > price difference. As Joel points out, let the multi-MW projects make the
  > stupid mistakes--that will just scare away the capital investment--oh wait a
  > minute--we really need that.
  > 
  > Bill.

  _______________________________________________
  List sponsored by Home Power magazine

  List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

  Options & settings:
  http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List rules & etiquette:
  www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

  Check out participant bios:
  www.members.re-wrenches.org




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  List sponsored by Home Power magazine

  List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

  Options & settings:
  http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List rules & etiquette:
  www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

  Check out participant bios:
  www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to