Thanks for a great response Matt, and an interesting lead to a product 
solution...

Let me preface this with saying I am installing another company's design, so 
all you are saying about proper
 gear at the service is totally heard, and this tap would not be something I 
would design...

The situation is a Wadsworth tandem 100amp main. Really rare and weird panel 
from the early 60s. It has
 2 service entrance masts, and a 8 jaw meter socket feeding 2 separate fused  
100 amp load centers.

The design was to tap into one of these with 40amp fused disconnect from a sma 
7000.

Unfortunately the wires in the Wadsworth gear is type TW which is not included 
in the Feeder exception of
 310.16. When this was discussed. I threw out there the idea of changing the 
wires. These guys wanted to
 void the listing for piercing taps and any other taps 

The REAL problem is the wording of NEC 690.64(B) because all these guys that 
are not willing to wrap
 their head around what the signal path/ back feeding/ over-current/ 230 
tapping scenarios are... read 120
 and wants to apply it to everything in the system. These inspectors were 
explaining to me that the feeder IS
 the buss and 120%... and its really hard to explain the intent with the 
language of the paragraph. It needs to
 be 2 separately described scenarios in my opinion, to avoid the constant 
misunderstanding.

Also, the NEC says in 690.64 and the 230 reference there, that taps are 
permitted for solar... not much
 detail, not much help. 

It seems like these inspectors consider the "voiding the UL listing" is a dead 
wall conversation ender. I'm
 almost willing to admit you are right, it is totally valid, which makes the 
point of .64 come into question.

I hope you are right about newer gear having listed tapping means and large 
buses for solar. It seems like
 that will take a while to filter down because so many people work with 
electricians different than the solar
 installers they are working with (and because so many installers focus on 
solar and don't wire houses). I
 think the glimmer of hope that a tap will pass on a retrofit is gonna keep 
them around for some time. And I
 really think that the code needs to address the options better.

looks like someone involved here is buying a service upgrade. surprise!


      
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to