I know you wouldn't, Warren. Because it is much more economical (that
means more kWh/$) to use a MPPT controller. But you would run a
100-volt 30-amp PV array to a MPPT charge controller that is 150 feet
away. For that distance, it takes 1/0 wire to get the wire loss down
to 1%. I'd probably settle for using 3 AWG copper with 2% loss. With
the smaller wire, the looses are 29 watts more, but the system cost is
less by at least $700. At $700/29 watts = $24/watt, the 1/0 wire is
not a good choice. My question is: what is the rational for using 1% loss as the design objective. Why not 1/2%? Why not 2%? So far no one has offered an answer to that question; despite many claiming that 1% or 1.5% is always their design objective. In Home Power issue 104, December 2004 - January 2005, I showed that striving for low voltage drops in low-voltage systems doesn't mean you've got a good (economical) design. The spreadsheet I created for that article is no longer available, but one that is easier to use is available from Ray Walters' web site. In SolarPro 3.2, February - March 2010, Blake Gleason shows an example where upsizing the wire size to get 2.6% loss is not economical. Kent Osterberg Blue Mountain Solar, Inc. Warren Lauzon wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org