This could just be due to the better temperature coefficient, or maybe
they do slightly better than cSi at lower irradiance levels?
Solar Frontier CIS: -0.31%/degC
SolarWorld poly: -0.45%/degC
I don't know enough about CIS to comment on the light soaking.
On 2013/2/18 8:36, Marco Mangelsdorf wrote:
Aloha,
Solar Frontier in Japan, the maker of copper-indium-selenium (CIS) mods,
claims that their product produces more kWhs per kW installed than
crystalline silicon.
http://www.solar-frontier.com/eng/cis/index.html If you go to the
Softbank Field Results on the right tabs area you can download a 4-page
PDF report.
I’m wondering if this is a hot-out-of-the-box phenomenon similar to some
other non-cSi products and that after X months in the field the output
stabilizes at a lower level.
Anyone have any idea or experience with this?
Thanks,
marco
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
