Hi Wrenches, I know I have seen this somewhere before but can't seem to locate it in the archives. Recently and AHJ rejected our plans because, although we were compliant with the 120% rule applied to the busbar on the existing sub which was our solar PCC, the existing breaker feeding the existing sub (our PCC) exceeded the 120% as it applied to the bus in the main. I was under the impression that the 120% applies to the bus at the PCC and that existing equipment "downstream" or "upstream" of the PCC need not be retrofitted to comply with the 120% rule (conductor ampacity aside). Cheers, Eric Stikes Founding Director & CEO Good Sun Solar, A CA non-profit corp. www.goodsun.life (530)798-3738
_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Change listserver email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out or update participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org