Kartik Agaram:

> My immediate reaction is positive, in spite of potential conflict with
> wart. It evokes a diff format.

That's encouraging.

> I can't think of any situation where "not x" will be at the left edge,
> so perhaps wart's rule could be: After a newline skip any immediate
> bangs.

For sweet-expressions, my proposal is to accept all three characters (space, 
tab, !) as an indent char.  Since you can mix them, you can do stuff like use 
bang-space-space as your conventional indent:
cond
!  condition1(x)
!  !  dothis()

--- David A. Wheeler

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss

Reply via email to