On 7/23/12, Alan Manuel Gloria <almkg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/23/12, David A. Wheeler <dwhee...@dwheeler.com> wrote: >> Next-line isn't really a Unicode thing. That's the EOL marker for IBM >> systems, and it's < 128. > > Huh?? > >> <next line> (U+0085) > > This is hexadecimal, right?
In any case, it still might not be safe to take on characters >= 128, as a random toy Scheme may not work on it properly... I suggest putting next-line into the portability layer anyway, just to be safe. Anything outside of US-ASCII is not 100% reliable on a random Scheme IMO, so I think putting them into the portability layer and allowing them to be disabled is best. Sincerely, AmkG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
