On 8/5/12, David A. Wheeler <dwhee...@dwheeler.com> wrote: > I still think we ought to map "EMPTY $ RHS" to "(RHS)". It's useful for > single-variable "let" and Scheme "do" loops. Since we don't even *allow* it > right now, it's even backward-compatible :-).
Precisely why I didn't allow it: I wasn't certain what semantics would be best for such a case, and I didn't have much time to think about it. So the error is more like "reserved for future use" than an actual error. If my thinking is right then this case simply requires calling into readblock-clean, making a list out of its return value, then consing a split-tag to its front (so that the outer clean doesn't unwrap the list). > > Good luck on BiwaScheme. Haha, sorry, was a little busy in RL last weekend. And what little hack time I had got spent on my own project (and found the memory leak in the streams implementation, which is why I also modded the example in the repo). Now that I've got readable/kernel.scm I don't need you guys!!!! (>o<) EVIL LAUGHTER!!! Lemme see what I can hack on this week. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
