I've updated the Rationale to discuss precedence: https://sourceforge.net/p/readable/wiki/Rationale/
In short: Would it be *possible* to modify curly-infix to support basic precedence? The answer is yes, and I've done my best to design such a system in case that is *necessary* to gain wider acceptance. However, I think we should *NOT* add precedence. It's not hard to *implement*, but any such system creates more complications and necessarily loses some homoiconicity. What's more, it could always be added *later* once simple curly-infix is widely used... whereas once a precedence system is added, it's impractical to seriously change or remove. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
