I proposed:
> > "An {} maps to (), {e} maps to e, and {e f} maps to (e f)."
Alan Manuel Gloria:
> Otherwise seems ok...
Okay, I've modified the "develop" branch with this changed semantic.
Please try it out! How's it look? Does this make sense?
Being able to say f{- x} is worth the admission price all by itself. My
initial fiddling suggests this is *REALLY* an improvement, and even more of a
pleasure to use.
--- David A. Wheeler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
