Alan Manuel Gloria: > Isn't the goal that, if the guile folks release sweet-guile, it is > essentially "the same", at least in spirit, to our own sweet-guile? > > If so, I think it would be better to use the same name.
I certainly hope they'll do "the same". But they may implement it in stages, and they have no particular reason to release other tools like "unsweeten" and "sweeten". So someone might want to install some of our tools, but not all of them. I suppose a plausible alternative would be some sort of auto-detect in the ./configure, to figure out which parts should be installed. We then have to detect which ones are "ours" and should be overwritten, vs. "someone else's". I guess we can insert special symbols to enable easy self-detection. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
