On 8/22/12, David A. Wheeler <dwhee...@dwheeler.com> wrote:
>> Alternatively, make process-sharp return a *list*, i.e. use the same
>> calling convention for parse-hash.  Then in the underlying-read, check
>> for '() and recurse if it is, or return the car if not.  This
>> alternative removes comment-tag as well, and you can return
>> comment-tag into process-sharp-comment-tag by simply converting '() ->
>> comment-tag and (a) -> a
>
> That sounds like the better approach.  I've got to sleep.  Feel free to make
> that happen!

Eh, at the office right now.  Be able to do so in some 6+ hours.

Sincerely,
AmkG

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss

Reply via email to