I said, about allowing {a ,op b} and similar:
> I can't see how to make that much simpler, and it's certainly more
> complicated than just replacing "eq?" with "equal?" in the spec.
Let's just release version 0.5 this weekend, without non-symbol infix
operations, and with the new mappings {}, {a}, {a b}, and while keeping (. e).
The new mappings are an important addition to curly-infix, and are clearly
justified. I really want to get *that* out soon. We can release the SRFI as
well over the weekend.
We can *then* discuss ,op and so on. The "right" answer is definitely not
obvious beyond what we've currently got, and the current solution is pretty
defensible. Perhaps more importantly, the SRFI release may get us some new
participants and fresh perspectives. We have ~60 days to fix up the SRFI,
let's take advantage of that time.
--- David A. Wheeler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
