David A. Wheeler scripsit: > * But should the *name* "restart list" continue? Is "superlist" better? > Or something else?
Given that a restart is a specialized kind of continuation in Common Lisp and some Schemes, and that "restart list" suggests "list of restarts", I think it is bad. "Superlist" also suggests some sort of datatype, but I have nothing better to propose at the moment. > * How should we handle FF/VT? I'm currently claiming that lines with > only FF/VT should be handled like ;-only lines, that is, completely > ignored. Thoughts? Historically, FF and VT were line terminators like LF, so I'd treat them as blank lines. The most recent use of FF in Lisp code was to divide code into chunks of related definitions. -- John Cowan co...@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan I am he that buries his friends alive and drowns them and draws them alive again from the water. I came from the end of a bag, but no bag went over me. I am the friend of bears and the guest of eagles. I am Ringwinner and Luckwearer; and I am Barrel-rider. --Bilbo to Smaug ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
