Alan Manuel Gloria:
> If back compatibility with Lisp in general was not an issue, what I
> thought I'd do was, I'd be like this:
...

At that point, of course, it's a completely new language, not just a new 
notation.

Nothing wrong with new languages, of course.  Indeed, historically Haskell grew 
out of frustration with Lisp's syntax and lack of static typing.  But getting 
new languages adopted is serious work; few make it, even good ones.


--- David A. Wheeler

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss

Reply via email to