Alan Manuel Gloria: > If back compatibility with Lisp in general was not an issue, what I > thought I'd do was, I'd be like this: ...
At that point, of course, it's a completely new language, not just a new notation. Nothing wrong with new languages, of course. Indeed, historically Haskell grew out of frustration with Lisp's syntax and lack of static typing. But getting new languages adopted is serious work; few make it, even good ones. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
