Alan Manuel Gloria: > Anything else we need to do? I know I saw a few commits a couple > weeks ago where David A. Wheeler synchronized the SRFI-sweet > implementation to the sweet.g ANTLR code, so I assume they're > currently still in synch modulo the current SUBLIST discussion.
We'll need to resync because of that, but no big problem. > Also, I think I saw some other finalized SRFI's where the > implementation is a separate file (also hosted on srfi.schemers.org); > I assume this is also acceptable up to now. I think it's better to > attach our latest src/kernel.scm file as a separate file rather than > embedding it into the SRFI document; the discussions and arguments for > various details are substantially long already, and the > implementation, I think, would be more easily browsed as a separately > viewable file. Really? Let's ask the SRFI editors first, but if we can, that'd be nice. We could also add some images of some of the BNF rules, too...! > For that matter, I propose adding a linked table-of-contents, down to > the level of each subsection in our lengthy Design Rationale section. > It's easy to get lost there I think. Sounds sensible. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
