Alan Manuel Gloria: > SRFI-sweet says that implementations MAY have sweet-expressions > enabled by default. That actually argues for having a #!no-sweet, and > having #!curly-infix disable sweet expressions but retaining > curly-infix.
Good point. For the moment, I've added a comment. This is clearly something that can be resolved after we start the SRFI process. Anyone: Any last words before we kick off the SRFI process? I intend to submit it later today. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
