Hi all,
I'm just gaining experience with writing sweet lisp code. Maybe I don't
see the right solution.
I use sweet code in the context of a web application at the moment. The
framework is template based. A page can be plain HTML or - for dynamic
content - elements or attributes in a special namespace are evaluated.
So the sweet expressions show up always as either content or attribute
values in the source. That's fine except for collecting lists. The <*
*> markers just don't look nice under XML quotation rules: <* >*.
Too bad.
By design I want tools like xmllint verify my spiced up html source.
I feel I need an alternative marker for them.
Anybody having better idea?
Assuming no better idea:
Q1: Which marker would be "good in spirit"? I'd propose to use {* and
*} as alternatives since { and } are already taken special anyway.
Q2: Would it be a good idea to allow this in the official spec?
Embedding in XML seems to have broad uses these days and I foresee use
cases for sweet list especially in domain specific languages.
Best Regards
/Jörg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
