At 10:15 PM -0700 9/2/06, Daniel L. Taylor wrote:
FWIW, I'm not sure how much can be gained by RS trying to introduce "automatic" MP in the language vs. the problems that could be created. I would rather see a definitive list of what framework classes and methods are safe to use in a preemptive thread, assuming potential synchronization issues are handled by the programmer.
I would agree with this but it needs to go a little further. I'd like to see RS have some officially sanctioned MP threading capability and then have them work on making the runtime as MP safe as possible.
Regards, Joe Huber _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
